Advocate SS Sidhu Everything About Criminal Lawyer In Chandigarh
Criminal Advocate Chandigarh - http://lawyerchandigarh.com/divorce-lawyers-in-chandigarh/. Chaudhury on the scheme Chandigarh Criminal Lawyer of the Act as embodied in sections 3 to 6 as strongly supporting the view that 'matters' in section 5 meant the same thing as 'description' in section 6. At one point of time, an issue had arisen before this Court, whether a complaint could be held to be maintainable without making the company a party. The High Court quashed the order by which further action Criminal Advocate in Chandigarh the matter was stayed by the Government with a direction to the Government to consider the applications pending Criminal Advocate in Chandigarh with it in accordance with law.
The High Court also held that the State Government had overlooked the provisions of the National Mineral Policy, 2008, which permitted facilitation of private entrepreneurs and that since the Government Chandigarh Criminal Lawyer of Kerala had already exercised its discretion in terms of the prevalent Mining Policy and recommended to the Government of India the grant of approval for mining leases, the rejection of the applications on the basis of a changed policy after the Government of India had accorded sanction for the proposed mining leases was unjustified.
The High Court took the view that the State Government had not reserved, in terms of Section 17 A(2) of the 1957 Act, the areas covered by the applications filed by the respondents and that so long as no such reservation was made, the direction issued by the Central Government to the State Government to reconsider Chandigarh Criminal Lawyer the applications could not be negated. The High Court also took note of the fact that Government of Kerala Chandigarh Criminal Lawyer had granted mining lease in respect of the area covered by four other applications and that there could not be different policies in respect of different areas covered by different applications made by the same Company.
By an order dated 21st February, 2013 passed by a Single Judge of High Court of Kerala, the Writ Petitions mentioned above were allowed in part by the High Court inasmuch as the order passed by the State Government was quashed and the matter remitted back to the Government to pass orders in the light of the observations made by the High Court. The said controversy has been put to rest by a three-Judge Bench decision in Aneeta Hada v.
To construe "distinct matters" as (1) I. He argued that under section 3 the duty was laid not on all instruments but on those which were of the descriptions mentioned in the Schedule, that section 4 enacted a special provision with reference to three of the categories mentioned in the Schedule, sale (conveyance), mortgage and settlement, that if Chandigarh Criminal Lawyers they were completed in more than one instrument, not all of them were liable for the duty specified in the Schedule, but only one of them called the principal document, and that section 6 provided that when the instrument fell under two or more of the categories in the Schedule, the duty payable was the highest payable on any one of them, that thus the categories in the schedule were the pivot on which the entire scheme revolved, and that in construing the section in the light of that scheme, the expression "distinct matter" must in the setting be construed as distinct categories.
Godfather Travels and Tours Private Limited[6] wherein it has been held that when the company can be prosecuted, then only the persons mentioned in the other categories could be vicariously liable for the offence subject to the averments in the petition and proof thereof. 9(2) of the Representation of the People Act and the Tribunal -found on evidence that the father was the real contracting party but without considering the evidence on the other point which, if believed, might sustain a finding that the father was meting on behalf of the family, presumed as a matter of law that the ion had interest in the contract and declared the election void, Held, that the Tribunal took an erroneous view of the law and made a wrong presumption, so its decision must be set aside, and as the findings are not sufficient for disposal of the matter the case must be remitted back for rehearing on the evidence on record nConsequently, in a case where an election was challenged on the ground that the candidate returned was interested in a contract entered into by his father, benami in the name of another, with the Government for felling trees and transporting timber and as such disqualified to stand for election under s.
It was contended for the petitioners that the impugned Act was void as contravening the above provisions nArticle 13, Clause (1) of the Constitution of Mewar provided that, "no person shall be deprived of his life, liberty or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied equality before the law within the territories of Mewar". (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any Director, Manager, Secretary or other officer of the company, such Director, Manager, Secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
Considerable stress was laid by Mr.
